gogosolot Astronomers want to change the definition of a planet
Image Credit: Unsplashgogosolot
Is Pluto a planet? You may have noticed that it has entered and exited that definition for years. In case you’re wondering, it’s not a planet anymore; it’s a dwarf planet.
Scientists change these definitions as they discover more about the world. Specifically, astronomers continue to learn more about outer space, challenging previous knowledge.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: X-rays discovered on Uranus for the first time
FEATURED STORIES TECHNOLOGY vivo launches V40 Lite with 5000mAh battery covered by 50-month warranty, starts at Php 13,999 TECHNOLOGY Galaxy Buds3 Pro: Delivering tailored sound wherever you go TECHNOLOGY Very mindful, very intuitive: ASUS’ most superior AI PC yet, the Zenbook S 14, empowers you to achieve moreThat is why UCLA professor Dr. Jean-Luc Margot and his team submitted a new definition for the heavenly body to The Planetary Science Journal.
What truly is a “planet?”ICYMI: The @IAU_org defines a planet as a celestial body that orbits our sun. ☀️🌍🪐 But scientists including UCLA astronomer @JeanLucMargot are proposing a new definition—and hope to get the astronomical conversation flowing. https://t.co/x9xNde1Wg3 #Astronomy #PlanetaryScience
— UCLA College (@UCLACollege) July 29, 2024Educational website New Atlas reported that the International Astronomical Union (IAU) first established the definition of a planet in 2006. This set of criteria is called the IAU Resolution B5, and it has the following rules:
Article continues after this advertisement The planet must orbit around the Sun. Also, it must have enough mass to become roughly round. It should clear the neighborhood around its orbit.B5 already had skeptics at the time due to its vague definitions. For example, the first assumes that planets only exist in our solar system.
Article continues after this advertisementHowever, astronomers have discovered over 5,000 around other stars. Moreover, Philip Metzger, a planetary scientist who worked on the New Horizons mission’s Pluto probe, said he has an issue with the third definition.
Article continues after this advertisement“They didn’t say what they meant by clearing their orbit. If you take that literally, then there are no planets because no planet clears its orbit,” he stated.
“The most problematic by far is the roundness criterion,” stated Dr. Jean-Luc Margot.
Article continues after this advertisement“Roundness is simply not observable. We do not have the technology, and we will not have the technology anytime soon,” the lead researcher added.
That is why Dr. Margot and his team thought people should define these heavenly bodies based on easily measurable properties: orbital elements and masses.
They computed the differences between a planet and a satellite to provide the new definition:
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
“Having definitions anchored to the most easily measurable quantity – mass – removes arguments about whether or not a specific object meets the criterion,” said Brett Gladmangogosolot, co-author of the study.
TOPICS: Outer Space, technology READ NEXT World’s first AI movie camera transforms footage in real-time SearchGPT, the ChatGPT search engine, now has a prototype EDITORS' PICK QC Mayor Belmonte highlights social services in State of City Address Marcos smiled, walked away when asked about VP Duterte’s accusation VP Sara Duterte says she still sees Sen. Marcos as a 'friend' WPS: US missile deployment to PH key for combat readiness – US general Manila Water Foundation and partners underscore benefits of handwashing Sandro Marcos calls out VP Sara Duterte: ‘You crossed the line’ MOST READ SC issues TRO vs Comelec resolution on dismissed public officials Tropical Storm Kristine slightly intensifies; Signal No. 2 in 5 areas Walang Pasok: Class suspensions on Wednesday, Oct. 23 LIVE UPDATES: Tropical Storm Kristine View comments